No doubt having the photos played a role.
If the photos were taken on a Polaroid and kept in her bedroom, we could say the same thing after a thief broke in and stole them to scan and sell online.
Would you also her blame her for having jewelry the thief stole and sold?
She’s just mad at the casting director that leaked them.
Happened in the 90s with the Pamela Lee Anderson video (stolen by a contractor). The judge ruled that because of the lawsuit it was newsworthy and could be released publicly. I think that forced her hand to negotiate a deal where at least she'd see some of the money.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_T._Owens
A subsequent Pamela Anderson sex tax (and case) determined that the second tape was not "newsworthy".
http://www.netlitigation.com/netlitigation/cases/michaels.htm
One bad court decision leads to repercussions.
The best way to avoid such situations it to exercise restraint.
I remember when Doctor Laura’s ex-boyfriend sold her nude photos to a public news agency. The guy was a creep but she poised for the photos and should have wondered what could happen to them.