[Organic Panic]

It is too sharp a political axe. If the SC decides to ignore the voters and legislatures and declare it legal it is off the table for the democrats. They need the power the issue gives them.

[Dilbert San Diego]

If they do take it up, no question that Ruth will vote to impose 50,#state homosexual marriage on the country.

We saw last year that there are five votes in favor of homosexual marriage on the Supreme Court. The only question really is whether they will go for a sweeping ruling imposing it on all 50 states in one fell swoop.

[2ndDivisionVet]

Translation: Married men, start shopping for your second and third wives before there’s a big rush. LOL

[PieterCasparzen]

Her new world order masters have instructed SCOTUS to wait a few years before imposing it on the sheeple.

[Oliviaforever]

Her arrogance is stunning.

Essentially, she is saying, “If the lower courts are all in agreement, we will let those black robe tyrants impose gay marriage on all circuits piece by piece, and if that does not work, Roberts, Kagan, Breyer, Kennedy, Sotomayor and I will impose it on All Of You! And in that process we will have no regard for the First Amendment Rights of Christians.”

There will be no freedom of religion for Christians, and there will be no Due Process or Equal Protection for Christians.

[clearcarbon]

"Asked whether she thought the Court might take the issue up this Term, Justice Ginsburg noted that all three appellate courts to address the issue so far (the Fourth, Seventh, and Tenth) have struck down state laws limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples. "

In ruthie's world, the whim of a judge trumps the "Will of the People."

[GeronL]

state laws limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples

Do you recall anywhere in the MSM that would have used that term for real marriages?

[GeronL]

state laws limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples

Do you recall anywhere in the MSM that would have used that term for real marriages just 10 years ago?