Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Dallas59

To me, the issue isn’t the protection. If someone produces a popular song, that is intellectual property and should be paid for. The crazy part to me is how long Congress keeps the protection going. They keep extending and extending, primarily at the behest of Disney, to the point where it goes on forever.


21 posted on 09/15/2014 9:53:12 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Opinionated Blowhard
To me, the issue isn’t the protection. If someone produces a popular song, that is intellectual property and should be paid for. The crazy part to me is how long Congress keeps the protection going. They keep extending and extending, primarily at the behest of Disney, to the point where it goes on forever.

A limit of protection of 20- 25 years maximum should suffice for any product whether intellectual or produced with ones hands IOW an invention. That would be more in line with the founders intent of these laws. It was to reward the original craftsman work but also too promote sciences. There should not be any more protection time allowed for someone who pens a song than for a company who pours hundreds of millions of dollars creating a new medication.

86 posted on 09/15/2014 6:19:08 PM PDT by cva66snipe ((Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson