[Navy Patriot]

Oh, I get it, you weren't saying Watts was a loser here, you were warning me the Jackboots and Bootlickers would give me grief.

Not necessary, I'm a big boy.

[PotatoHeadMick]

Sorry it was my use of the term “on to a loser” that caused the confusion, I see, it’s a British term meaning on a hiding to nothing.

Trying to convince cop-worshippers that the freedoms enshrined in the United States Constitution apply to everyone or eventually they apply to no one is such a hopeless cause in my experience.

One does not have to like Ms Watts or her choice of clothes (though frankly I have no idea what’s wrong with them) to accept that she is as entitled to 4th Amendment protection as a died-in-the-wool conservative white guy in a Brooks bros suit. If she loses her constitutional rights, then very soon everyone loses them.

Sorry for the initial confusion.