Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Moonman62
Yes it is, but you can’t use a lens or a camera such as infrared that can see more than the naked eye sees.

More bullsh*t. There is no such limitation in the Federal court decisions and the US DoJ memo on this topic.

Quote: Individuals have a right to record (photograph) in all traditionally public spaces, including sidewalks, streets and locations of public protests.

http://www.justice.gov/crt/about/spl/documents/Sharp_ltr_5-14-12.pdf

40 posted on 09/12/2014 8:49:36 AM PDT by MeganC (It took Democrats four hours to deport Elian Gonzalez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: MeganC

More bullsh*t.

...

You would be more convincing if you didn’t express yourself that way.


43 posted on 09/12/2014 8:52:59 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: MeganC

I love how you actually provide the facts to back up your statements; but those on the other side just whine about the naughty word.


45 posted on 09/12/2014 8:55:39 AM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: MeganC

You are correct.

I think there is a lot of misunderstanding about what can be photographed, and what can be sold.

Personal use and commercial use are two very different things.


46 posted on 09/12/2014 8:57:39 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (Ebola: Death is a lagging indicator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson