Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv
I disagree. When Kenyon dated Jerico her work was taken as authoritative by so many working in the field, that an entirely, bible-rejecting, road was taken.

I have met too many working in various fields of science who do not question prior work, take it as accurate, and then build upon another's faulty foundation.
21 posted on 09/13/2014 8:19:20 AM PDT by jps098
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: jps098

Kenyon’s work took place the better part of a century after the bias against the Bible had taken over everywhere. In order to undermine the divine right of kings the content of the Bible had to be rejected (or rather, that was the preferred path — rejecting the divine right of kings is something that doesn’t actually derive from the Scriptures).

That didn’t even begin with debunkers — the exaggeration of the age of the 19th dynasty is still supported by purported “Bible was right” people, who saddle on the ridiculous idea that Ramses II was pharaoh of the Exodus or the Oppression.


23 posted on 09/18/2014 7:34:36 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson