[tacticalogic]

Yes they are--and since you know that phrase was related to his belief of fraud, rather than the exposing of evolution as fraud, you twisted that whole thing around to make it look like I was cherry-picking words.

You were cherry-picking. My complaint was not with the assertion that evolution will eventually be found to be fraudulent (it might or might not be), but with the assertion that it is and always has been because it contradicts the Bible, and what the consequences of using that as an established standard of fraud would be.

[BrandtMichaels]

Q: “what the consequences of using [the Bible] as an established standard of fraud would be” ~ [I’d prefer to have it say established standard of truth or even absolute truth].

A: A country where truth, justice and liberty prevail! Or just maybe the closest thing to utopia this side of Heaven!