So you’re in favor of science by consensus?
Also is the science really only settled with a majority?
Or is there a certain higher percentage you’d prefer?
The problem, though, is that evolution is not science--which is why they can claim "consensus."
It is not reproducible
It is not falsifiable.
Also is the science really only settled with a majority?
Or is there a certain higher percentage youd prefer?
I'm in favor of considering unintended consequences. Have you done that?