More than in DHS.
And how Obama and liberal appointed judges work around legislation? And how the powers that be redefine the language to suit their agenda? People that think like we do have been defined already as potential domestic terrorists.
I can dream up things to worry about too. The real question is: Which do you want rounding up "terrorists," DHS or a national militia subject to heavy penalties for false arrest?
I can’t argue with with that kind of thinking.
Apparently. I suggest you re-read the Second Amendment and ask yourself what would be the purpose of said "well regulated militia." If you think it only the National Guard, then you've got it wrong both historically and politically.
I guess I’ll argue after all, in that I believe your bounty system will only increase the police state, as that bounty will end up being a “turn your neighbor in” program that will be rewarding for the non-militia types to be snitches on those of us who may have disagreement with the current administration. Good intentions initiate the program and it becomes extended by do-gooder liberals and others until there is a price on my head.
If you think it’s a good idea, or the only alternative to our doom in a police state that we both know is ever encroaching, get the movement started.