[conservatism_IS_compassion]

Progressivism, on the other hand, tends to view the human spirit as intrinsically good. For some progressives, “good” becomes a relative term defined by the individual. The only “bad” is to infringe on another person’s ability to express their own version of “good.”

WHAT a load of horse manure.

From Wikipedia:

Progressivism is a broad political philosophy based on the Idea of Progress, which asserts that advances in science, technology, economic development, and social organization can improve the human condition . . .

I don't see anywhere that humans are intrinsically good. I also see ONE person's definition of "progressivism.”

HORSE puckey.

I wouldn’t suggest taking dictionary, let alone Wikipedia, definitions of political terms too seriously. If you consult Safire’s New Political Dictionary, for instance, you will learn that the meaning of “liberal” was changed - essentially inverted - in the 1920s. And anyone who considers the matter realistically will realize that the term “progressive” has undergone a similar metamorphosis. After all, one of the few powers the Constitution explicitly grants to Congress is

To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries

And yet the modern “progressive” systematically looks for reasons to regress from the use of fossil fuels upon which modern electric power and cars and trucks depend.

[cloudmountain]

I've read the things on "Progressivism" and it's many things to many people. One's ideas of what is progressive might be very personal. One's political party's ideas of what is progressive might differ from mine.

It doesn't really matter WHAT it is.
Medically, it's wonderful to progress. However, we can't live forever. SOMEthing has to end our lives. Perhaps it boils down to quality of life.

Educationally, financially, there are so many way to express ideas about "progress" there.
It's been KIND of an interesting discussion, don't you think? NOTHING will be solved here, as usual, but we do get to express ourselves.

[ProgressingAmerica]

This is why I use my blog to bring their history to the surface, to make it easier to find with a simple search.

Progressivism is a specific ideology, but nobody is reading the progressives’ own history, so historical facts get supplanted by modern opinions. When there are no real facts on the table, any topic can be tabula rasa. Look at what the progressives have done to the Founders, first by starting with simply not teaching them anymore.

It does matter what progressivism is, because if there ever came to be enough conservatives who could cite chapter, page, etc., of all the evil things these people have written, today’s progressives would have a very big problem on their hands.