There were a number of people, including many on this forum, who have been very quick to criticize those of us who pointed out the "sudden" change in narrative that perfectly fit the 0bama regime's importing of ebola into the US. Amost overnight that "strategy" went from isolating ebola in africa, because it was highly contagious, to throwing open the doors to bring it here. Along with is, the narrative went from "high contagious" to "can't be spread through the air".
Curiously, though, when the infected do-gooders were brought here, there was double bagging - infected in a spacesuit and medics in a spacesuit. Now, if ebola can only be spread through contact, why did they do this?
To show that they were taking every precaution, even though the degree of it was not necessary. It's what they do.
But like all other speculative thinking, their motives are now challenged by using the precautions as a double edged sword..
That's schizoaffective type thinking. Unwarranted and delusional. I don't imagine the current residents of the white hut want to die from Ebola in the U.S. any more than you do. And I have trouble picturing Michele willingly sacrificing her kids for "the cause". And, no, there aren't enough doses of anti-viral to go around for all the Obamas, Bidens, Pelosis, Reids, et. al.