Regulating for purity and age restrictions is also an infinitely better use of taxpayer dollars than imprisoning sellers of alcohol, tobacco, or pot. It makes no sense to make selling illegal but buying legal becasue they're merely two perspectives on the same act.
So you say that pot in itself injures nobody but the user? So a stoner driving after years of abuse and dumber than a box of rocks and zoned out due to dead brain cells is no danger driving
As soon as you introduce driving into the scenario it's no longer about "pot in itself."
we have too many naturally stupid people in this world why grow that number?
Should we shrink that number by recriminalizing the stupid-making drug alcohol?
As a tee-totaler and someone who does not suffer drunks well I am not one to ask :) My constitutional loving side says no, my side that hates drunks and see any addiction as a severe weakness says maybe. So far my constitutional side is winning.