Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ConservingFreedom
Beat that straw man. It's easier than addressing what I've actually said.

Well I recall you did use the word "Alcohol" and you did invite a comparison. If you are making a different argument, it is so subtle that no one can discern it.

The only thing that sticks out is "We need Pot because Alcohol." Again, no other message is coming through.

Perhaps you could rephrase your point without using words like "booze, or Alcohol", then perhaps we could see what you are getting at.

120 posted on 08/18/2014 11:46:41 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
Well I recall you did use the word "Alcohol" and you did invite a comparison. If you are making a different argument, it is so subtle that no one can discern it.

As I've explained to you more than once, the point is to see if what you posted was a principle or merely a rationalization - if the former, you'll apply it consistently, including to the drug alcohol.

123 posted on 08/18/2014 11:52:59 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson