To: Smokin' Joe; PA Engineer; Alamo-Girl; Dark Wing; Black Agnes; Jim Noble; 2ndreconmarine; ...
Given the fact that a child was born with Ebola, has there been a test to see if either parent has been exposed to Ebola, or found the virus within their gonads ?
Or, is it possible that either parent had Ebola without any physical symptoms ? Or perhaps both parents ?
Or , is it possible that Ebola virus formed a protective cover (like a cyst) to re-appear at a later date ?
5,013 posted on
11/03/2015 10:11:05 PM PST by
Tilted Irish Kilt
(The GOPe and Karl Rove got Obama elected twice. .. How'd that work out for ya ?)
To: Tilted Irish Kilt
All that and more.
It is also possible that the male parent of record is not the daddy, or that infidelity exposed the fetus to the virus in utero (from the semen of a survivor).
When this outbreak was fresh, it was said we really did not understand the disease, and we’re learning more every day.
5,014 posted on
11/04/2015 3:15:50 AM PST by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: Tilted Irish Kilt
Dear Lord, this becomes more monstrous as time goes on.
5,017 posted on
11/04/2015 1:13:53 PM PST by
Covenantor
("Men are ruled-...by liars who passing refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern." Chesterton)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson