[Smokin' Joe]

A study published in 2005 pointed to a theoretical risk that dogs could pass the Ebola virus to humans through urine, faeces or saliva, but there is no evidence of this ever having happened, virologists said on Thursday.

And every scientist knows that the absence of evidence is NOT evidence of absence.

Just because something has not been studied, peer reviewed, and published, does not mean it does not exist.

[ElenaM]

And every scientist knows that the absence of evidence is NOT evidence of absence. Just because something has not been studied, peer reviewed, and published, does not mean it does not exist.

I'm afraid current "science" just doesn't work like old time science. Nowadays cooling is caused by warming, a magic form of thermal energy escapes all detection until 2000 meters beneath the surface of the ocean, and Ebola must behave as the CDC demands. Anyone who doesn't believe those statements is, by the definitions of "new science," an anti-science nut.