To: exDemMom
None of the references in that article support their argument that Ebola could be airborne.
That is odd. I don't remember reading anything about them arguing it was airborne. Where did you see that? They argued it was an "aerosol-transmissible disease."
3,245 posted on
10/07/2014 9:08:02 AM PDT by
PA Engineer
(Liberate America from the Occupation Media.)
To: PA Engineer
That is odd. I don't remember reading anything about them arguing it was airborne. Where did you see that? They argued it was an "aerosol-transmissible disease." Aerosol transmission = airborne transmission.
What they describe is droplet transmission.
3,283 posted on
10/07/2014 6:22:31 PM PDT by
exDemMom
(Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson