Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jack Hydrazine

Ebola spreading rate compared to other diseases
http://sploid.gizmodo.com/ebola-spreading-rate-compared-to-other-diseases-visuali-1642364575


3,096 posted on 10/05/2014 4:50:17 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3095 | View Replies ]


To: Jack Hydrazine
Well, it has been my experience that theory works just fine in theory.

Now if everyone who has Ebola will kindly only infect two people, those numbers will be right.

Fomite transfers do not appear to be taken into account, and rightfully so, because the presence of Ebola Fomites in a modern urban area is unprecedented.

The problem, though, is that Ebola is compared with diseases that don't kill as many of the infected (with the exception of HIV/AIDS--which can be slowed down quite a bit with treatment, and SARS, which is rare because it was dealt with appropriately). If two people are infected with Ebola, under the best of circumstances one will die. Measles? Infect 18, and you expect them all to live.

3,102 posted on 10/05/2014 9:51:11 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3096 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson