Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Shelayne; Black Agnes; Smokin' Joe; Covenantor; Dark Wing
Shelayne:"... First of all, he(Dr. Kent Brantly) tested negative at first, so they tested him again 72 hours later, and that was positive. Second, he is absolutely certain that he did not get infected in the isolation ward, as they were so very strict with their practices, procedures, and PPE."

#1) The doctors first test negative, second test (72 hours later) , was positive - he could have been shedding virus in that 72 hour period. Testing is known to have false negatives.
#2) "he had not had a single patient survive Ebola up to the point he was infected. Not a single one. - that reaffirms him shedding virus, since statistics previously show a median 30 - 40% recovery rate.
#3) he is absolutely certain that .. they were so very strict with their practices, procedures, and PPE." - much of that medical protective gear which already was needed to be upgraded.

1,879 posted on 09/11/2014 6:02:01 PM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1875 | View Replies ]


To: Tilted Irish Kilt

Just a note about the PPE that Brantly and his team were using. It was all being provided for by Samaritan’s Purse, so they did not have to depend on what would be available at the African hospitals or clinics. I would think that they had the best possible PPE that Samaritan’s Purse could provide for them.


1,889 posted on 09/11/2014 8:49:44 PM PDT by Shelayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1879 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson