To: chuckles
I am not a capital “L” libertarian because the party tends to run nut cases for candidates.
I see myself as a Constitutional ‘originalist,’ a social and economic libertarian, capitalist, pragmatist, and anti-federalist in the 1787 way, and a moral conservative Christian.
In other words, the modern Tea Party. ;-)
3 posted on
08/04/2014 5:48:03 PM PDT by
Blueflag
(Res ipsa loquitur: non vehere est inermus)
To: Blueflag
BlueFlag, you spoke for me as well.
4 posted on
08/04/2014 5:59:22 PM PDT by
VR-21
(Next Stop, Willoughby.)
To: Blueflag
I see myself as a Constitutional originalist, a social and economic libertarian, capitalist, pragmatist, and anti-federalist in the 1787 way, and a moral conservative Christian.
Unless I am misunderstanding your post, you cannot be a social libertarian and a moral conservative Christian.
Those two characteristics cannot co-exist in the same body.
12 posted on
08/04/2014 6:32:22 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: Blueflag
In other words, the modern Tea Party. Except that the tea party isn't libertarian, it is actually more religious and more socially conservative than the average republican, not less so.
18 posted on
08/04/2014 6:56:06 PM PDT by
ansel12
(LEGAL immigrants, 30 million 1980-2012, continues to remake the nation's electorate for democrats)
To: Blueflag
37 posted on
08/04/2014 7:31:31 PM PDT by
ravenwolf
(s)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson