That's just wacko Sovereign Citizen mumbo jumbo with no connection to reality.
No, it is an analysis of specific statutory constructions which were invoked by the Chief Justice in his actual ruling. As in he pointed to specific words and said "read that," so I did a really radical thing and - OMG - actually read them.
Nowhere in the specified statutes is sovereign citizenship mentioned, and in fact the only thing discussed is the applicability of the law, which is it's literal connection to reality.