Yes, I do.
No state can pass law telling the federal government what it’s abortion and gay marriage laws and rules are in regards to the military, federal employment and immigration and such.
And why should those be federal issues?
Shouldn't those people be subject to the states wherein they are Citizens? [Baring immigration, which I agree that Congress has the authority to regulate.]
IOW, why do you insist that the federal government should have even more power than it does now?
I wish it to have less — most of what it has now is usurped anyway.
LOL, see, you are a dedicated fighter for abortion and gay marriage.
The feds have their own areas of control, for instance in marriage and the military, the Congresses were passing law in regards to that in 1780, 1794, and 1798, 1802 and ever since, regardless of your evasive fantasies to avoid admitting that you are fighting us on gay marriage for the feds, just as you fight us on abortion and the feds, the feds have their own medical facilities, that is why the military could get abortions during the Vietnam war era, and they also have to decide law and policy for immigrants and in the state department and in foreign policy.
After the left has homosexualized the military and legalized gay marriage for themselves, and adopted it and abortion in federal areas of immigration and the state department and foreign policy,,,,now jump up to oppose conservative efforts to roll back those laws, with this goofy argument that reversing the recent federal laws is unappealing to you because now we need to leave federal law to the liberals and stay our of it.
I don’t care about your little fantasy world, it does bother me that we conservatives are the ones you oppose here.
It’s our pro-life and pro-marriage politics that you fight and mock, you want to make your gains at the federal level under Obama unchallenged, we want to reverse them.