I read your first post and it made no sense even with your vague confused reference to asset forfeiture...which was designed to make sure drug money couldn’t just be passed. Around and held on to after a criminal conviction.
My comments stand
Nothing about it was vague or confused. But that’s your story, stick to it if it gets you through the day.
Oh and your wrong. Asset forfeiture was to impede drug money from being used for expensive legal defense (I.E bribes and such). Note how forfeiture occurs before the conviction and becomes a second and altogether different set of court proceedings where one can be found innocent of crime, yet the forfeiture stands.