Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LibWhacker

I don’t believe that for a second. In my many years of nursing, the standard was that with a virus, one starts becoming infectious within the 24 hours prior to onset of symptoms. I don’t think they want that info spread because it would make people panic.


10 posted on 07/31/2014 11:35:22 PM PDT by pops88 (Geek chick standing with Breitbart for truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: pops88

That’s better than being infectious immediately. Quickly scanning wikipedia, I couldn’t find that information and is why I posted the question.


17 posted on 07/31/2014 11:49:03 PM PDT by No One Special
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: pops88

Yep. I was reading on Canada’s Public Health website about Ebola, and according to them, there is a possibility of infecting someone before showing symptoms, which is what one would expect with any other virus, so why would this be different?


26 posted on 08/01/2014 12:26:30 AM PDT by Shelayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: pops88

“...the standard was that with a virus, one starts becoming infectious within the 24 hours prior to onset of symptoms.”

Even IF one isn’t contagious until after symptoms, the symptoms are like the flu. Muscles aches, low fever, etc. Those symptoms (the kind lots of people, and almost all men, shrug off)) can last for several days until the more severe symptoms show up that may cause one to go the the doctor.


43 posted on 08/01/2014 1:19:33 AM PDT by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts 2013 is 1933 REBORN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson