Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: taxcontrol

And you’re still stuck with the fact that it wasn’t a forced sale so the tax law in question doesn’t apply anyway.


30 posted on 07/30/2014 8:54:33 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg
Again, please read the actual tax code. It does not require the NBA to actually vote to seize the property.

Section 1033 — Involuntary Conversions

(a) General rule --

If property (as a result of its destruction in whole or in part, theft, seizure, or requisition or condemnation or threat or imminence thereof ) is compulsorily or involuntarily converted --

The threat of requisition and seizure was communicated by the NBA commissioner. For a threat to be valid, it only requires that the threat be possible (NBA can vote to strip an owner of the team) and that the threat be communicated. Added to the fact that a judge in a court of law sided with the NBA sale, this most definitely qualifies as an involuntary conversion.

32 posted on 07/30/2014 11:09:38 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson