Skip to comments.
“Out of Africa” Theory Officially Debunked
Atlantean Gardens ^
Posted on 07/27/2014 9:49:37 AM PDT by djf
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 last
To: blam
Thanks for that link - interesting reading.
41
posted on
07/27/2014 5:17:23 PM PDT
by
P.O.E.
(Pray for America)
To: mountainlion
I am Irish. Why are you so insulting?Because I am also Irish.
42
posted on
07/27/2014 5:19:43 PM PDT
by
Albion Wilde
("The commenters are plenty but the thinkers are few." -- Walid Shoebat)
To: Harmless Teddy Bear
Yes, that's possible. The royal families don't necessarily have the same ancestry as the general population and intermarriage has long been a way to practice politics. Like others have said, it would be good if they published the findings.
43
posted on
07/27/2014 5:57:28 PM PDT
by
Varda
To: djf
44
posted on
07/27/2014 6:00:21 PM PDT
by
MaxMax
(Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
To: GreyFriar
Thanks for the ping to this very interesting article.
45
posted on
07/27/2014 6:31:13 PM PDT
by
zot
To: Marie
Here is the distribution of
Homo erectus, a pre-human species.
46
posted on
07/27/2014 8:14:42 PM PDT
by
Pharmboy
(Democrats lie because they must.)
To: Pharmboy
47
posted on
07/27/2014 9:08:10 PM PDT
by
Marie
(When are they going to take back Obama's peace prize?)
To: djf
What, you mean Lucy isn’t really the great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great....great grandmother of us all.....
To: djf
“ATLANTEAN GARDENS”?????
What is this site?
There is no question mankind originated in Africa.
The only legitimate questions are did “modern man” simulataneously evolve in three continents (unlikely), did modern man interbreed with earlier types of hominoids which had evolved from earlier migrations out of Africa like Neanderthals (highly likely) and, if so, what degree of impact did that have on non-African “modern” man, and at what point in the past did “modern” man outside Africa diverge from African populations.
49
posted on
07/28/2014 8:23:02 AM PDT
by
ZULU
(Go REDSKINS!!! Impeach Obama!!!)
To: blam
Nice to see that what we have argued about for years is coming around to our side.
50
posted on
07/29/2014 9:29:33 AM PDT
by
Little Bill
(EVICT Queen Jean)
To: Pharmboy
51
posted on
07/29/2014 10:23:03 AM PDT
by
blam
(Jeff Sessions For President)
To: mountainlion
52
posted on
07/29/2014 10:40:27 AM PDT
by
blam
(Jeff Sessions For President)
To: blam
Yes...I can understand that approach; we can use the definition of species regarding ability to mate, and we most likely would have been able to, therefore we are one species. However, there were clear enough differences in brain capacity and skull morphology for the anthropologists to give
H. erectus its own designation. IMHO, I would consider it another species and not a subspecies or race.
I could be wrong, but then again...
53
posted on
07/30/2014 5:45:27 PM PDT
by
Pharmboy
(Democrats lie because they must.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson