If it’s the issue of subsidies, it’s not a typo. The author stated it was intentionally designed that way.
You are correct. Democrats thought that they could force republican governors into having a state exchange by making the subsidies contingent on having an exchange.
Not so fast.
The question now is whether the judicial branch is going allow the executive branch to change the statute without having to go back through congress...
The liberal 'round-about' continues, and their control of the various media outlets allows it to happen...
Initial response...it's a type in the legislation. Clearly that wasn't the intent
A few days later, the renowned architect of the system is shown on tape in 2012 saying the intent is exactly what is in the legislation. The left responds - 'what he says is irrelevant. He didn't write the law.
Round and round we go.