[metmom]

providence/natuer gave us all those body parts and the functionality that goes with them. it is the woman who has issues with pictures of the body parts and by transitivity with providence/nature. the attitude of the woman that sex is shameful is just passing on her psychological trauma to her son, who is the victim. i wonder what she does to him when they visit a zoo. what kind of commotion does she throw up then? “don’t look, those bad zebras are doing IT! don’t watch!! bible this!! bible that!! blablabla!!” sheesh.

That's an awful lot of ASSumptions you're making there about someone based on an article you read.

Do you like to assassinate everyone's character that much based on that little evidence?

You know what? Go back to DU, troll.

[SteveH]

they are not assumptions.

1. nature exists, can be discussed dispassionately, and is a baseline for our existence.

2. the woman has obvious emotional issues with sex online. and iphones. and internet. and religious beliefs. those are not assumptions— she documents them in her article. as such they are fair game for discussion.

3. I do not frequent DU. I am more of an alt.politics.clinton.whitewater reader. i have on fr since 1998 or so. DU was launched in 2001. i see you have been on fr since 2005. do you know what you are talking about??