[wideawake]

who is guilty of more serious crimes and corruption by a series of magnitudes

You've repeated this bizarre question multiple times.

NYPD officers - not the ones involved here, but other officers at other times - have committed felonies.

Eric Garner - like those other, unrelated officers - also committed felonies.

So the "magnitude" is the same: felony.

Of course, none of the cops involved in this incident have felony records, but Garner does.

So in this case, Garner is guilty of more serious crimes than any other principal in this incident.

[dragnet2]

NYPD officers - not the ones involved here, but other officers at other times - have committed felonies.

The agency they work for has a clear pattern of serious corruption and crime. No? Do they not all work for the same agency?

Why does the background of Garner matter, if NYPD's history of crime and corruption not matter?

You say there is no double standard in government? Right?