[for-q-clinton]

There’s no bias in this trash article.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

So what is your Malware protection?

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

He is not a fan of Intel either.
Or of Nvidia’s shady practices.

[R. Scott]

A shill for Linux?

[rarestia]

*yawn*

Semiaccurate is exactly that.

This is a non-starter. Microsoft’s been on desk for anti-trust and security issues before. You can’t fix personal habits, and Microsoft shouldn’t have to.

I’m far from an MS fanboy, but I am a Windows server engineer. I administer numerous domains including a mixed-mode Linux/Server 2012 domain in my own home. Microsoft products do what they do. If you want ironclad security, go buy a product from Symantec or use one of the myriad free AV programs and for God’s sake, be a little bit more discriminant about whose emails you open.

If grandma doesn’t normally send you emails with attachments, don’t open one when you get it!

[logi_cal869]

Oh no, no bias at all.

</sarc>

Birdcage liner.

[daniel1212]

There’s no bias in this trash article.

The lack of objectivity, such as the many problems with his presumed alternatives, and that one can run Windows for years with extensive Internet use without any real problems with malware, weakens his case against MS.