1 posted on
07/12/2014 10:46:29 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
2 posted on
07/12/2014 10:52:38 PM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself.)
To: BenLurkin
That’s all well and good — but are they going to formally verify the chip-designs for future processors?
It seems to me that having your processor mathematically proven correct would be a good thing.
3 posted on
07/12/2014 10:54:39 PM PDT by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: BenLurkin
How much of this will be done in China considering IBM is largely an Chinese company now.
12 posted on
07/13/2014 3:58:25 AM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: BenLurkin
That`s pretty bold talk for a one-eyed fat man.
Processing power and higher density integration is important, but handling 'big data' is where the major challenge is now, and more so in the future.
14 posted on
07/13/2014 5:09:23 AM PDT by
uncommonsense
(Liberals see what they believe; Conservatives believe what they see.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson