I think you have lost your case as soon as you are arguing technique. Suppose CHP doctrine differs from yours? More than a likelihood!
You lost the second you said he was outclassed by the woman, and admitted to having lost with post 286.
But hey, you like excessive force being used against women.
Its all legal and by the book supposedly.
Hint: he did not have to punch her despite your obvious enjoyment of same.
Besides, you argued technique with your “its approved” statement.
So by your logic in this post...you lost on that point too.