The only problem with that is there are multiple victims claiming Harris molested them.
When you dig deeper into the actual allegations, which were not stated in this article, you will find that they dealt strictly with improper touching or fondling, not sexual intercourse.
And since the events of these claimants occured in the 60's, 70's and 80's, (30, 40 and 50 years ago) I have to question the legitimacy of these accusations as well as how it came to be that all these so called molestees were located.
Last but more foremost in my mind, who stands to profit most from the imprisonment of Harris? The "grieving" daughter whose best friend had the most compelling testimony against him?
I'm not about to argue his innocence or guilt, I'm just saying that all of this occuring decades after the alleged incidents occured stinks to high heaven..........