“If you are going to refute someone, use facts. If its not physics, what is it? Why?
Dont just whine like a 3 year old. Prove your point, at least anecdotally, or dont make it at all.”
Someone who uses the statement: Its not magic, but likely physics. is demanding facts?
What scientific principle in physics supports water-witching? Give something fact based to rebut instead of ludicrous, superstitious bs and we’ve got someplace to start at least.
Someone who uses the statement: Its not magic, but likely physics. is demanding facts?
What scientific principle in physics supports water-witching? Give something fact based to rebut instead of ludicrous, superstitious bs and weve got someplace to start at least.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Clearly you did not read my entire original post. You read the words you wanted to and interpreted them (wrongly) the way you wanted to.
You are stuck on the name and not the reason.