Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Colofornian

The first YouTube comment was “dude in a suit”. But the view was too brief and lacked enough definition to call it either way.

The best to date is the Paterson film from the 60s. It has been analyzed umpteen times but not debunked to my satisfaction. Those were pre-Velcro days yet no seams or zipper lines could be seen. You oud deect the movement of muscle under the hairy skin. Proportions of arms, legs and torso don’t fit ant typical modern human (even Bobo!). The stride length could not be duplicated by a human, even one seven feet tall and weighing 600-700 pounds. And it...er...she was a female. Even the breasts moved in a natural manner.

If the Paterson film was a fake it was one of the best ever!


22 posted on 06/28/2014 9:26:26 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JimRed

You oud deect = you could detect


23 posted on 06/28/2014 9:28:14 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: JimRed
If the Paterson film was a fake it was one of the best ever!

Perhaps the others are fakes of such low quality that Paterson stands out.

24 posted on 06/28/2014 9:57:31 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson