Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Citizen Zed

Bosh. Taking your pants off isn’t “redefining” anything. It’s plain old stripping, even in black and white.


2 posted on 06/27/2014 1:35:23 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Let the storm rage on ... the cold never bothered me anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick

First ladies should be “classy” first .... if they can manage to be sexy while being classy, then more power to ‘em. No pants is not ‘classy’.


3 posted on 06/27/2014 1:36:36 PM PDT by Qiviut ( One of the most delightful things about a garden is the anticipation it provides. (W.E. Johns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Tax-chick

I *think* the one who might appear pantless is the teen daughter, and she’s more than likely wearing short shorts under the jacket. Suggestive, at the very least, but I’d be surprised if she were really pantless.

Sexiness in a First Lady isn’t something we have to worry about any too soon in the U.S.A.


14 posted on 06/27/2014 1:41:23 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson