Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Blue Ink
In exchange for a monopoly on a frequency and the freedom to sell ads, the courts enforce prohibitions against exhibitors charging a fee to broadcast a network signal — hence the war on sports bars charging to show NFL games. The signal itself must remain “free.”

It matters not to the NFL whether you charge or not. If your screen is too big you can't allow other people to watch it, and you can't have more than a few people watching a small screen.

I'm not saying you are wrong about the broadcast rules in general, I'm just pointing out that the NFL has a special drug deal going on.

40 posted on 06/26/2014 11:29:13 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: SampleMan

I see your point re the NFL special deal. They work hand-in-glove with the networks, who can only get this nonsense enforced because they’re pushing past the terms of their broadcast license when they go after people having a big-screen viewing party in their home.

Networks/NFL: “Yeah, the signal is free... but you’re enjoying it TOO much! So you should be paying us!”

What kind of argument is that? Surprised the courts have bought into it... but I work in television, and this industry (along with movies) has some of the most effective, gun-slinging killer lobbyists at work on its behalf in all of D.C. Generally they get whatever legislation and regulation they want. Nobody lobbies for the people.

I’m surprised the FCC and Congress have managed to hold the line so long on keeping the broadcast airwaves free.


41 posted on 06/26/2014 11:44:06 AM PDT by Blue Ink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson