Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: kanawa

Facts would require me to have access to the bodies of the dead animals and proof that those were indeed the animals in question - not the hearsay of someone who claims they were there and saw the right dogs. Did she not agree with the vet? Who else saw the dogs? Were they DNA tested and just didn’t look as pit (mix) as one would expect or? Facts have evidence - you have hearsay. And the pro pit bull lobby has said time and time again that animal control officers have misidentified a non-pit as a pit so how am I to accept hearsay from an animal control office that a dog designated pit is actually a non-pit? You have baseless assertions, nothing more.


128 posted on 06/25/2014 8:13:03 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote
It seems you give more credence to a newspaper reporter
than to an Animal Control Officer who had observed the dogs.

Why is that?

You ask many pertinent questions but do you make any effort to answer them?
Apparently not.

Why is that?

It is because you are a True Believer, you recoil from honest investigation
and are immune to information that contradicts your preconceived notions

You have the characteristics of an obsessive, moral narcissist... a fanatic.
Reasoning, facts and common sense have no power over you.

You find strength and personal vindication in your sense of moral superiority
but in reality you are rather intellectually and morally feeble.

130 posted on 06/25/2014 10:23:24 PM PDT by kanawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson