“Do you think the evidence presented in this article is sufficient to disprove the theory of evolution?”
No, I don’t really think that this evidence alone is enough to do that. It might be enough, taken together with a lot of other evidences, to show the theory to be dubious.
“If so, doesn’t it provide the same disproof of any theory that the dinosaurs were wiped out in the flood?”
Yes, sure, if this could be shown to be positively a depiction of a living dinosaur, then that would have to mean they survived much later than the flood. Unless, of course, our dating of the temple and its builders were way off.
Doesn’t the article strike you as being a little one-sided in terms of what theories and ideas this evidence supposedly casts doubt upon?