To: right-wing agnostic
The information should be put out there. It is not this writer’s call on whether or not it is relevant. That is up to the voters. He can say that it is not relevant to him, but the fact he writes for the WaPo establishes that.
11 posted on
06/22/2014 9:08:25 AM PDT by
Starstruck
(If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarcasm or criticism...or do.)
To: Starstruck
Sorry, he doesn’t write for the WaPO.
12 posted on
06/22/2014 9:10:21 AM PDT by
Starstruck
(If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarcasm or criticism...or do.)
To: Starstruck
The information should be put out there. It is not this writer’s call on whether or not it is relevant. That used to be the standard for journalists. Report the facts, and let the chips fall where they may. This helped keep Americans informed, and free.
But today every story must go through filters. Non-PC stories are buried. Stories that democrats look bad are buried.
18 posted on
06/22/2014 9:18:18 AM PDT by
Leaning Right
(Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson