Posted on 06/15/2014 6:44:50 PM PDT by kingattax
I never thought I would say this, but the Democrats have sunk to a new low. I liked them better when they were getting whole cemeteries to vote Democrat. The Democrats know that they can’t win using ethical methods, like standing on their accomplishments, so they’re using illegal aliens and their children to force immigration down the throats of law abiding American citizens. I mean, who doesn’t have pity for children? You’d have to be a real monster to want to send children back to their countries of origin without their parents accompanying them right?
Well, the next logical step, in the minds of Democrats anyway, is to bring the parents of these child immigrants here to be with them. After all, that’s what being “liberal” is all about right, “compassion” for families? What kind of monster would want these children to be separated from their loving parents?
(Excerpt) Read more at patriotsbillboard.org ...
“However, if there is one man who can take the most credit for the 1965 act, it is John F. Kennedy. Kennedy seems to have inherited the resentment his father Joseph felt as an outsider in Boston’s WASP aristocracy. He voted against the McCarran-Walter Act of 1952, and supported various refugee acts throughout the 1950s.
In 1958 he wrote a book, A Nation of Immigrants, which attacked the quota system as illogical and without purpose, and the book served as Kennedy’s blueprint for immigration reform after he became president in 1960.
In the summer of 1963, Kennedy sent Congress a proposal calling for the elimination of the national origins quota system. He wanted immigrants admitted on the basis of family reunification and needed skills, without regard to national origin.
After his assassination in November, his brother Robert took up the cause of immigration reform, calling it JFK’s legacy. In the forward to a revised edition of A Nation of Immigrants, issued in 1964 to gain support for the new law, he wrote, “I know of no cause which President Kennedy championed more warmly than the improvement of our immigration policies.” Sold as a memorial to JFK, there was very little opposition to what became known as the Immigration Act of 1965.”
Problem is, no opposition party in the (D)istrict of (C)riminals.
Why not??
Getting the illegals angry and into the streets is how they won the 2006 election, why shouldn’t it work again?
Just goes to show that you can’t trust Democrats. Oh, wait, we already knew that.
Any ideas on how we do that? They stopped listening to us a long time ago.
And the Republican plan is to help them.
Wish we could ship them all to blue states and cities.
God specializes in Gordian knot cutters.
make um bigger and badder???
Oh man....is that photo of the witch photoshopped to make her look even worse?
That is untouched and real. No amount of airbrushing can conceal the reality of She Who Must Not Be Named.
DEMOCRAT STRATEGY TO WINNING THE MID-TERM ELECTIONS IS TO FLOOD THE U.S. WITH ILLEGAL ALIENS
Most of us, here, have known this - since the first day these *imports* were being reported.
Americans have a model for defeating tyranny. the only question is do we have the same courage the patriots at Lexington and Concord had ?
Holy cow! Yes Cow.
That picture of Hillary. Wow, just wow.
Maybe Michael Savage is right - she’s too ugly to get elected.
Money talks. It’s what the Chamber (of commerce) wants.
These “children” will very soon be adults and the dems will have their wish. There aren’t too many little ones there. I can’t for the life of me understand why any Republican for amnesty doesn’t see this. They are either getting paid off or just plain stupid.
I think a massive phone, fax and email campaign works. It worked when Bush wanted amnesty. Why aren’t all the citizens that came here legally up in arms about this? I don’t get it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.