Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: wideawake

If those are accurate stats for Marilyn Monroe, she was much smaller than average, and a very nice shape.


20 posted on 06/03/2014 10:26:45 AM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: SeaHawkFan

She wasn’t smaller than average..she was average..today..where girls get boob jobs for a HS graduation present..our senses have become conditioned to inflated bosoms..


21 posted on 06/03/2014 10:28:30 AM PDT by ken5050 ("One useless man is a shame, two are a law firm, three or more are a Congress".. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: SeaHawkFan; ken5050
MM was of average height, with a below average waist and an above average bust.

Think of it like this: a bust to waist ratio of 35:22 is 1.6, vs. the average ratio which was 33:24.5 or 1.35.

That's a 20% variance in the ratio which, to a normal male observer is . . . eye-catching.

26 posted on 06/03/2014 10:36:59 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson