RE: Even if homosexuality is natural, it doesn’t prove it ought to be.
I must not be logical enough to figure out the logic in that particular statement.
_______________________
An IS ( i.e. homosexuality IS in-born) does not necessarily imply an OUGHT ( i.e. homosexuality OUGHT TO be morally acceptable ).
THAT is what the author is trying to drive at.
If they are born that way does that mean all forms of strange sexual bahavior is because they were born that way? Somehow I think that there are better explanations.