Posted on 05/30/2014 7:17:41 AM PDT by massmike
A couple says they were told not to come back to a restaurant in East Texas because they’re gay.
In the town of Pittsburg, Texas, Big Earl’s Bait House and Country Store is an institution. So Collin Dewberry and his partner Kelley decided to have breakfast there. He says everything seemed to be going fine until they paid their check and were approached by their waitress on the way out.
“She told them the rules are on the door and it says ‘Welcome to Big Earl’s where men act like men, women act like ladies, no saggy pants and we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone.’”
“And so I laughed and I asked what do you mean?” says Dewberry. “And that’s when she said to us… ‘to put it plainly, we don’t serve fags here.’”
Big Earl Cheney, the owner,says the reason Dewberry and his partner were asked not to return was because of their actions.
“What I saw was one of them half way under the table with his legs stretched out into the other guy’s lap. And he kind of looked really possum eyed at me as they say it in East Texas, he kind of looked at me like ‘uh-oh’.”
Cheney says he refuses to admit the couple back into his restaurant.
He continued, “I’m not gonna have people coming in here with their butt showing; I’m not gonna have people coming in here naked; I’m not gonna have people coming in here having sex on the tables.”
Dewberry maintains they were doing nothing wrong and were discriminated against.
“Nobody deserves to be treated disrespectfully at an establishment that just seconds ago accepted their money.”
(Excerpt) Read more at dfw.cbslocal.com ...
You mean Texas, the state that has Houston, with the Lesbo Mayor?
they look really broken up over the whole incident. The fact that they were ready to run to the media suggests that the whole thing was a set up.
That’s the one.
I like your idea. I would go so far as to invite a few hetero couples who were regular customers to enjoy a free meal, with the understanding that they show inappropriate public displays of affection. I would then very publicly “throw them out,” thereby setting a precedent that would permit the same response if degenerates came in.
In other words, set them up the same way they set you up.
Or you could have a couple of customers “on call” who would show up and harrass the fags until they left. Of course, you would publicy admonish the “intolerant” customers, but since they did nothing but loudly express their opinions, your hands are tied.
Then there’s always the option of serving the queers “saliva and mucus-enhanced” entrees ...
Yes and if people would just stop serving, working for, employing, patronizing those that help push homo/liberal/communism ect, we would quickly be on the road to recovery as a nation.
Law says you have to serve gays? OK. Serve them ...with contempt. Don’t serve all the non gays that help them. No discrimination laws cover that. Lots of ways to skin a cat if only people would do it. Our ancestors shunned people all the time to great effect.
Start by defunding them. Then make life in the neighborhood a bit chilly for them.
I disagree. My GAQYDAR pegged at seeing their picture.
I disagree. My GAYDAR pegged at seeing their picture.
I don’t believe this story.
“Then there’s always the option of serving the queers “saliva and mucus-enhanced” entrees ...”
Anyone who considers that an ‘option’ is mentally disturbed.
“Gay rights”
There are three stages of societal change;
I. Acknowledgement
II. Acceptance
III. Participation
When it comes to this homofaggotry insanity, I refuse to play along. Will not comply, will not participate!
Most with perverted suggestions reminding us of their perversions.
“
You mean Texas, the state that has Houston, with the Lesbo Mayor?”
Yes, the same. And Anus Porker the lesbo Houston mayor has passed a law that opens public restrooms and showers to any sexual variation.
Insanity, sheer complete insanity.....
Back in the 1960s I think, there was an eating place in Dallas that had a whole collection of signs. One was: “We reserve the right to serve refuse to anyone”.
Refusing people because of characteristics, like skin color was wrong.
Refusing people because of behavior is perfectly justifiable.
They ate the breakfast so they were charged. No issue there.
And the “hate crime” goons will be called in to file federal charges.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.