To: SunkenCiv
I despise the use of the idiotic phrase BCE instead of BC. Any publication that uses it is immediately suspect.
4 posted on
05/24/2014 8:57:40 AM PDT by
gibsonguy
To: gibsonguy
One would think that an organization/media dedicated to uncovering, preserving and sharing history would at least honor and preserve ours.
Why change 'BC' now and attempt to re-write history?
5 posted on
05/24/2014 9:02:57 AM PDT by
NativeSon
( Grease the floor with Crisco when I dance the Disco)
To: gibsonguy
I can see why you would feel that way. Of course it’s only been used for the last three hundred years and was advocated by Jewish scholars in Europe who understood the utility of the Gregorian Calendar but felt that acknowledging Christ was irreligious. And if by “any publication” you mean every scholarly journal, then I’m afraid your access to knowledge will be pretty limited.
7 posted on
05/24/2014 9:22:04 AM PDT by
stormer
To: gibsonguy; NativeSon
I despise the use of the idiotic phrase BCE instead of BC. Any publication that uses it is immediately suspect. Regardless of its adoption, the need to do so still originates with Jesus Christ. Once He appeared, He struck history with such impact that He split it in two, dividing it into two periods: one before His coming, the other after it. Buddha did not do this, nor any of the great Indian philosophers.
8 posted on
05/24/2014 9:31:46 AM PDT by
NYer
("You are a puff of smoke that appears briefly and then disappears." James 4:14)
To: gibsonguy

i tell who ever says that, "you mean Before CHRISTIAN Era?" it drives the RATS mad...
12 posted on
05/24/2014 11:46:25 AM PDT by
Chode
(Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
To: gibsonguy
Yes, I suspect the publication of using a scholarly convention.
13 posted on
05/24/2014 11:52:13 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson