Posted on 05/16/2014 1:37:38 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
The question raised by NBAs Stephen A. Smith, Spike Lee, and several NBA players, current and past, is Why is it taking so long to fire Donald Sterling? NBA Commissioner Adam Silver was so strong and strident in his announcement that steps would be taken immediately to do just that. There was no ambiguity about whether they were going to fire Sterling for his racist comments against African Americans. It is a done deal. Commissioner Silver surely would not have made such a profound announcement without having consulted the other NBA owners. So why hasnt the first shoe dropped?
Like an onion, the answer has several smelly layers, and several lawyers. The first shoe is Donald. The second shoe is Shelly, his estranged wife and 50% owner of the family trust that owns the LA Clippers. The NBA is more concerned about the second.
The most important deliberative point I suspect is this: One or both of those shoes may sue the NBA and its owners. I have several legal reasons for why a Sterling suit would ultimately fail, not the least of which is that the controlling owner from the trust was Donald. He is the only one on the governing board, and the removal of him effectively removes the trust. But that does not stop either Sterling from commencing the action, and getting to a stage we call discovery. During discovery, a lot of dirt can be discovered about the other owners.
Donald, himself a lawyer has been litigious in the past. Shelly is lawyered up with tall cotton firms....
(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...
I think those remarks were him preemptively trying to protect himself. Lord knows, he's probably lived a life that would make Charlie Sheen's look tame. How many women have dirt on him?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.