Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SoFloFreeper
He has broken no law. He has not refused to pay his employees. He has a right, even as a senile old idiot, to own a business.

He doesn't own a business. He owns a franchise. The NBA is a business. Imagine a McDonald's franchise owner. He is required to do certain things or his franchise will be taken away.

Think about sports franchises. They are part of a business that can suspend their players or even ban them for infractions. Sterling bought in as a partner. If you are a partner in a law firm and your actions are causing a loss in business don't the other partners have the right to force you out?

If he wants to take his franchise and strike out on his own then let him do it. He bought it.

28 posted on 05/14/2014 1:25:59 PM PDT by Starstruck (If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarcasm or criticism...or do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Starstruck

Yeah, I do see what you mean, it just does not fit with the notion of freedom....The rights of an association are not absolute nor do they overrule an individual’s freedom.

My hope is Sterling drags this out in court long enough for society to see this as nothing more than a lynch mob/kangaroo court mentality. Two days of media fomenting and “civil rights” activists griping is enough to take away a man’s achievements??? Give me a break.


34 posted on 05/14/2014 4:14:10 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: Starstruck

I just read post 27, a seemingly reasonable legal case for Stirling to resist Adam Silver’s action.


36 posted on 05/14/2014 4:17:59 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson