[JSDude1]

I am sorry, but it wasn’t right for the large supporter to start the rage in this (lost) person by grabbing them, then pushing them to the ground! There are NONE innocent in this scene, except maybe the man holding the sign!!

[Mechanicos]

Defense of others makes it right and the little pervert thing assaulted the innocent preacher guy first.

The only one in the wrong was the little screaming pervert.

[warsaw44]

friend, what do you think would have happened if the larger man was not there to protect the preacher?

That thing would have clawed his eyes out.

[babygene]

“I am sorry, but it wasn’t right for the large supporter to start the rage in this (lost) person by grabbing them, then pushing them to the ground! There are NONE innocent in this scene, except maybe the man holding the sign!!”

Not only did the man in the red shirt have a right to defend the preacher from an assault, he would have had the right to use deadly force if need be.

[Towed_Jumper]

Are you saying Christians don't have the right to actively defend themselves from people who are physically assaulting them? The kid/women/student/man/it whatever it is was the one who first got physical.

I would have planted that person head first into the concrete if they had assaulted me, and I'm a Christian.

Oh, and BTW...ASU (Arizona State University), is my undergraduate Alma mater —the pastor is standing in front of the Hayden Library.

[Osage Orange]

Yep...you’re sorry....................