You denigrate your own “point” now (whatever it is) with invective and argumentum ad hominem. It’s crystal clear that “boiling beef/goat in milk” is not the same as the specific act of boiling a baby goat in it’s own mother’s milk—in context, that was an act associated with idolatry of the time.
You do not become “right about” anything by asserting the absence fallacy. Never mind your being deliberately mendacious about the scriptures not saying “a word against rape” when it clearly does.
BTW, what does any of this have to do with George Will? Surely you are not presenting yourself as representative of Mr. Will’s personality.
Nonsense. It was a list of foods that were permitted and not permitted. Which was apparently, far, far more important than squeezing in a sentence or two about rape. Why? Because that’s the Middle East. That’s them then and that’s then now. To take them as your guide is as foolish as looking to the Mayan calendar for signs as to the end of time.