Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai
Here is a 2014 Congressional Research Service paper on the proposed reductions:

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R42493.pdf

Interesting reading.

If you equate 3 BCTs to a division, the proposal is to go from 14 2/3 active duty division equivalents (44 BCT) down to 8 active duty division equivalents (24 BCT). Army leadership says it can't do the job with any less than 9 1/3 active duty division equivalents (28 BCT).

The report also notes that the Army wants to add a battalion to each one of the 24 reserve BCTs. 24 battalions is equivalent to the infantry strength of 2 2/3 divisions.

40 posted on 04/21/2014 2:53:06 PM PDT by Captain Rhino (Determined effort today forges tomorrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Captain Rhino

Not trying to nitpick. But what job is it they are going to be having trouble doing?

Are we being invaded or are we planning a tank battle on the Steppes?

The world has changed. The Army needs to change with it.


43 posted on 04/21/2014 3:19:58 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (If you want to keep your dignity, you can keep it. Period........ Just kidding, you can't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson