Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv

Wouldn’t the test show how old the tree was from which the canoe was carved, not when the carving was done? Or am I missing something?


13 posted on 04/11/2014 10:12:43 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SoCal Pubbie

It would show when the tree tissue last lived.


15 posted on 04/11/2014 10:25:54 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: SoCal Pubbie

Right, the RC dating shows the oldest possible date, which is the youngest ring; if the bark is present (possible, but unlikely), the date of the cutting can be found. But this is a hollowed out log; the only missing layer is likely to be the last one, so, they know when it was cut. :’)


22 posted on 04/11/2014 10:50:07 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: SoCal Pubbie
Wouldn’t the test show how old the tree was from which the canoe was carved, not when the carving was done? Or am I missing something?

Generally people build things out of freshly cut wood. They might have even taken advantage of a fallen log that was one or two years old, but after that the logs tend to rot. So the reasonable assumption is that this was carved within a short time frame of when the tree died.

28 posted on 04/11/2014 12:05:46 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (My tagline is in the shop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson